[Box Backup] Re: boxbackup digest, Vol 1 #126 - 3 msgs
brett
boxbackup at fluffy.co.uk
Sat Sep 4 17:02:24 BST 2004
That's an interesting point, especially since it wouldn't introduce any
additional load on the backup server, but rather on the client. I think
while it would be nice to have server-replication built in to bbstored,
being able to have multiple copies of bbackupd running definitely
alleviates the immediate need, and is probably better for most
situations since it keeps the 'cost' paired with the 'need'
b
> From: Ben Summers <ben at fluffy.co.uk>
> Subject: Re: [Box Backup] Re: boxbackup digest, Vol 1 #125 - 2 msgs
> Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2004 08:09:59 +0100
> To: boxbackup at fluffy.co.uk
> Reply-To: boxbackup at fluffy.co.uk
>
>
> I suppose you could run two copies of bbackupd...
>
> Ben
>
>
> On 4 Sep 2004, at 05:01, brett wrote:
>
>>
>> Maybe a better idea would be to add provisions to boxbackup for
>> multihost backups. It's really the only thing i can think of that's
>> missing ;)
>>
>> b
>>
More information about the Boxbackup
mailing list