[Box Backup] ./runtest.pl common debug fails
boxbackup at fluffy.co.uk
Wed Nov 16 12:55:41 GMT 2005
Ben Summers <ben at fluffy.co.uk> wrote:
> Differences in clib. The test expects that when a tiny allocated
> block is resized to a very big block, its address will change as it
> is moved from one pool to another. You clib doesn't appear to work
> this way. The test is there to check that the memory leak detection
> will keep on tracking the block even if it's address is changed.
> As I said, nothing to worry about. Just an incorrect assumption about
> malloc algorithms, which isn't even important to a running Box
> Backup system.
I've removed that check in one of my branches, since it fails for me on
FC4, and as you say, it's an invalid check. Oddly, it always worked on
FC2 and 3!
More information about the Boxbackup