[Box Backup] Development feedback & discussion for Box Backup 1.0?
Achim J. Latz
achim+box at qustodium.net
Tue Jan 18 00:20:03 GMT 2011
Hello Charles:
On 18/01/2011 00:37, Charles Lecklider wrote:
>> The issue is that the MMC snap-in is closed source. This is incompatible
>> with GPL but fine for BSDL.
>
> Exactly. Having thought about this some more, I'd like to propose that
> lib/backupclient and lib/backupstore get put under the LGPL. That would
> let me do what I was doing before the change, yet still allow BB to be
> included in the various Linux distros that caused the change in the
> first place.
Am I correct that you are advocating another licensing change in order
to be able to distribute your proprietary binary?
Since this sub-thread started about existing GUIs, I was under the
impression that we are talking about options available to the project.
I understand now that you are talking about "a GUI" that can be used
with Box Backup, not necessarily one that is include in the project.
Best regards, Achim
--
Achim J. Latz, Qustodium Internet Security
achim.latz at qustodium.net · http://www.qustodium.net
Data Encryption · Backup Automatisation · E-Mail Protection
More information about the Boxbackup
mailing list